Part of The GMP Training AcademyAll GMP courses
Templates

The templates the course is built on

Structure and guidance for every section, free. The sections that carry the most weight in an inspection show their heading and a summary here; the full guidance, the worked examples and the editable files are in the course.

Module 6 · used by Investigators, area owners, QA reviewers

Deviation report

The full record of a deviation from detection to closure, structured so that an inspector who was not there can reconstruct what happened, what it could have affected, and why you concluded what you did.

  1. 1. Identification

    Deviation number, date raised, site, area, product and batch numbers initially in scope, raised by, QA contact.

  2. 2. Problem statement

    The requirement (document number and version), the observation (what, when, where, by whom) and the detection (how it came to light). No causes, no conclusions.

    • What instruction, specification or parameter was not met?
    • Exactly what was observed, with times and identifiers?
    • How was it detected, and by whom?
  3. 3. Immediate actions and containment

    Actions taken in the first hours with times and names: line stop, quarantine, evidence preserved, samples retained, who was notified.

  4. 4. Classification

    Full version in the course

    Class assigned on the worst credible effect. Rationale. Recurrence check result. Notifications required by the class.

    The course adds the full guidance, the questions this section must answer, a weak and a defensible worked example, and the reviewer's notes.

  5. 5. Scope

    Every batch, product, material, equipment, system and record potentially affected, with the basis for the boundary. 'None' requires a rationale.

    • What else was in the same room, on the same equipment, in the same window?
    • Which other products share the equipment or utility?
    • Which records were produced under the same conditions?
  6. 6. Investigation

    Full version in the course

    Timeline from objective records, interviews, evidence reviewed by identifier, analysis tool and its output. Observation and inference kept separate.

    The course adds the full guidance, the questions this section must answer, a weak and a defensible worked example, and the reviewer's notes.

  7. 7. Root cause and contributing factors

    Full version in the course

    The condition that, if removed, would prevent recurrence. Contributing factors listed separately. Detection failure addressed.

    The course adds the full guidance, the questions this section must answer, a weak and a defensible worked example, and the reviewer's notes.

  8. 8. Impact assessment

    Full version in the course

    Quality attribute at risk, mechanism, evidence by document number, conclusion for every item in scope. Validated state, data integrity and regulatory commitments covered.

    The course adds the full guidance, the questions this section must answer, a weak and a defensible worked example, and the reviewer's notes.

  9. 9. Disposition

    Decision on each affected batch or material, who made it, the basis, and whether regulatory notification was considered.

  10. 10. CAPA

    Full version in the course

    Each action linked to a cause, with owner, date, and an effectiveness check that names what will be measured, over what period, against what evidence.

    The course adds the full guidance, the questions this section must answer, a weak and a defensible worked example, and the reviewer's notes.

  11. 11. Approvals and closure

    Investigator, area owner, QA. Dates consistent with the timeline. Extensions documented. Trending codes assigned.

Module 4 · used by Investigators

Investigation timeline worksheet

A structured way to reconstruct the sequence of events from records and interviews before any analysis tool is applied, and to see where the records and the accounts disagree.

  1. Evidence register

    Every record consulted, by identifier: batch record pages, equipment logs, alarm logs, audit trails, training records, environmental data. Who retrieved it and when.

  2. Interview log

    Each person interviewed, when, by whom, and their account recorded in their words. Interviews within 24 hours, conducted separately.

  3. Timeline table

    Timestamp, event, source (record or interview), and a flag where sources disagree. Ordered strictly by time.

    • Where is the last point the event could have been prevented?
    • Where is the last point it could have been detected?
  4. Gaps and conflicts

    Full version in the course

    Periods with no record. Points where the record and an account differ. Each is either resolved with further evidence or carried into the analysis as an open question.

    The course adds the full guidance, the questions this section must answer, a weak and a defensible worked example, and the reviewer's notes.

  5. Hypothesis list

    Full version in the course

    Every candidate cause raised so far, including the ones in the original problem statement, each to be tested against the timeline.

    The course adds the full guidance, the questions this section must answer, a weak and a defensible worked example, and the reviewer's notes.

Module 6 · used by CAPA owners, QA

CAPA and effectiveness check plan

Defines, before implementation, what each corrective and preventive action is for, who owns it, and how you will know it worked.

  1. Action register

    Each action, the cause or contributing factor it addresses, its type (correction, corrective, preventive), owner and target date.

  2. Cause-to-action check

    For each action: if this had been in place, would the event have happened? If the answer is not a clear no, the action or the cause is wrong.

  3. Effectiveness check design

    Full version in the course

    What will be measured, the period, the evidence source, the acceptance criterion, the reviewer and the check date, set after the event has had opportunity to recur.

    The course adds the full guidance, the questions this section must answer, a weak and a defensible worked example, and the reviewer's notes.

  4. Check outcome and escalation

    Full version in the course

    Result against the criterion. If failed, the investigation is reopened; record the new deviation or CAPA reference.

    The course adds the full guidance, the questions this section must answer, a weak and a defensible worked example, and the reviewer's notes.

The full versions

9 sections are summarised above. The course opens all of them.

When the course opens you get the three templates as editable files, every section with full guidance and worked examples, three complete practice records, the assessment and the certificate. 3 hours, self-paced.